lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
A.I.InnovationPeople, Process, ProblemService Design

The secret to successful technology? It’s magic (but not what you’re thinking)

by info@lawtomated.com August 15, 2020
August 15, 2020 0 comment
11 min read

There are only two types of trick

Tricks for magicians, and magic for everyone else. And there are only two types of innovative technologies. Those for technologists and those for everyone else.

That’s it.

The best magicians master methods, know their audience and are guided by effect. The same is true for the best technologists, start-ups and innovators.

Know your audience

Tricks for magicians focus on method. Tricks for audiences obsess over effect; how an audience experiences the illusion and how well the trick meets or exceeds their need to be entertained and mystified.

Magician to magician tricks

The audience are other experts in a technical subject matter, i.e. sleights of hand, gimmicks and so on.

This does two things.

  1. It raises the bar in terms of what is necessary to fool the audience. The information asymmetry between performer and audience is minimal, unlike a lay audience who typically know very little / zero magical technique.

  2. It changes the quality of enjoyment. Although lay audiences like to guess at methods (more on that later), magicians analyse tricks to reverse engineer them, and this is part of the fun magicians experience.

A magician to magician trick therefore succeeds best when it is a “magician fooler”. It does so in two ways.

First, the audience magicians enjoy exhausting their magical knowledge. They feel smart, but challenged applying their expertise to reverse engineer another’s efforts at creating something new and cutting edge. The fact they failed, can be invigorating, affirming that there is more to learn!

Second, because the audience magicians understand method they are no longer able to experience effect; doing something that allows them to be fooled again creates a very rare experience, and huge value. It satiates a need.

Tech is no different. Engineer to engineer presentations / applications of technology are designed to wow on the basis of their technical complexity and ingenuity’ to create a FOMO that one engineer has mastered or discovered something another has not, and sometimes push debate and enquiry.

Magician to muggle tricks

For lay audience tricks, everything is effect. But wait, don’t audiences love guessing the methods of a magician’s tricks?

Of course they do, but don’t confuse audience enjoyment guessing secrets vs. having them revealed.

Audiences want the secret, but need the effect.

If you give them the secret, there is no effect.

The Prestige - They'll beg you and they'll flatter you for the secret - Alfred Borden
Alfred Borden – The Prestige

Knowing methods is not the real reason the audience came to see the show: they came to enjoy effects, which includes guessing (rather than knowing) the methods behind them.

There’s a difference between what the user wants (secrets) and needs (experiencing the effect of the secret and the fun of guessing the secret, without needing it revealed). Great magicians execute on needs, not wants.

Alfred Borden – The Prestige

And so with tech. Although a knowing focus on the method – AI, blockchain, search, rules etc – might grab attention, especially if said tech is flavour of the month in hyped up media coverage, it also distracts from what the user needs, the problems they have and the best solution for the job.

In the end, this serves neither user nor technologist. So how can technologists learn from magicians?

The (Successful) Magician’s Secret

Successful magicians perform for lay audiences. After all, it’s an art form intended primarily to fool non-magician audiences. Likewise, business and consumer-facing technology is designed for end-users who aren’t computer scientists.

Assuming you are a technologist designing, building, marketing, pitching, implementing or driving adoption of, some new product or service – what is it you can learn from the likes of David Blaine, David Copperfield, Dynamo, Penn & Teller and Derren Brown to wow your business and consumer audience?

Kellar Magician with Magic Cabinet

Master your methods, prioritise by effect

Mastery of method enables excellence at effect. The greatest magicians seek out, voraciously study and obsessively practice methods. They also test, test, test them on audiences, improving them or changing them over time.

But they do so, guided by effect.

They are seeking the best method, or combination of methods, that produce the best effect. In many cases, this will be the method or methods that allow most room for presentation and execution.

These two factors – presentation and execution – are what separate dull from good and good from incredible, even if the underlying trick, plot or method is identical between two magicians.

In other words, attention on the audience’s needs and experience. Great technology does the same.

The Prestige - The secret impresses no one - Alfred Borden\
Alfred Borden – The Prestige

Simple maybe. But not easy

In the 2006 Christopher Nolan film, The Prestige, chronicling two rival magicians there is a central magic trick. Not only is this a real trick, but it also doubles up as the central plot twist.

Without spoiling the film, this conceit is – as the magician Borden puts it – incredibly simple, but not easy.

Indeed, a central plot point is the failure of the rival magician to comprehend that the first magician’s effect (i.e. product) could be achieved so simply, instead obsessing over unnecesary, dangerous and overly complex technological innovations to achieve the same effect.

And this is a key lesson.

Too often, magicians and technologists obsess over the complex, and disregard simpler alternatives. The allure of the complex is also a risk for users and innovators in their organisations. If you’ve ever heard someone say “we should get an AI” or “can we use some AI” when what they need is a simple Word macro you know what we mean.

But this isn’t to say simple is easy.

Often simple done well is just as hard as clever, but for different reasons.

Simple enables thinking space to focus on execution against needs.

In magic this is mostly presentation. In technology this is the product-market fit, UX, whether or not your solution solves a real and significant problem for your users and so on.

Check your geek

As a result, the best technologists and start-ups keep abreast of new ideas, experiment with them but importantly check their geek. They weigh up, often with others (product specialists, users and so on), what best solves the user’s problem.

In most cases, best isn’t cleverest or the most cutting edge shiny new thing. It might be, but it often isn’t or if it is, it is one variable in a much larger equation that must not distract from solving the problem.

Which leads nicely into…

Don’t forget what you have / know

Magicians are famously greedy, gobbling up new tricks as they launch. The best magicians keep this in check, often preferring to perfect existing techniques rather than chase the latest shiny object.

Technology is no different.

During the Space Race, Nasa invested millions designing an over engineered pen that could write in zero gravity where, it was assumed, ink would not flow toward the nib. Russia simply gave its Cosmonauts standard pencils, which work on earth as they do in zero G. Same result: hugely different costs.

© Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum

It’s a great story, but it’s not true (see here for the real story, or the link under the above photo).

Nevertheless, it’s an instructive parable.

Don’t rush to the most cutting edge solution if all the user needs is something simple, and in the above example, something you might already have but not think to use.

Shiny objects are often sharp

Not all magic tricks are harmless card tricks. For instance, the infamous Russian Roulette trick.

The plot goes something like this:

The magician presents a sharp nail on a wooden base, which is placed point up under a polystyrene cup.


Next, the magician introduces additional upside down polystyrene cups and then asks a spectator to shuffle the cups until it is no longer possible for anyone to identify which cup conceals the nail.


Afterwards, the magician then has the spectator eliminate cups one by one, often reshuffling the cups after each selection to increase the “randomness” and make it even harder to identify the dangerous cup from the safe one(s).


Eventually, two cups remain. The magician asks the spectator to choose one of the remaining cups.


This time the magician does not remove the chosen cup.


Instead, the magician slams either their palm, or the spectator’s, onto the final remaining cup.

There is either a shared outtake of breath from the audience followed by a cheer… or gasps of horror.

The former is when this trick goes well… the magician magically avoids the nail, knowing all along via “psychic” skills where the dangerous nail hid.

The latter is what happens when the trick goes wrong, i.e. nail through hand = hospital visit. No more show bookings. Potential lawsuits. And so on!

This trick has, and continues, to go wrong from time to time, injuring magicians and spectators, including on live TV. See below if you aren’t squeamish. The UK”s most famous magician, Derren Brown, has even gotten this badly wrong during rehearsals (see here).

So what’s this got to do with technology?

Well this is a reminder of why mastery of method is critical, even if the focus is on its relationship to effect.

If the method isn’t clear, safe, and bug-free, for end-users to rely upon in different settings it can harm.

The same is true of technology.

It is often more true for new and “high tech” solutions that aren’t yet well understood by end-users… and sometimes by the technologists themselves, who’ve simply copied and pasted some code, or installed a code library.

AI is a good example.

Today’s AI relies heavily on data, statistics, probability, linear algebra and calculus. Most of these components are poorly understood by users in isolation, let alone in combination when used to deliver AI solutions. Some software engineers building such systems don’t really understand the underlying math, and in some scenarios this doesn’t matter in order to build good products, but in others it absolutely does.

For instance, simple misunderstandings regarding the accuracy and how and why these systems produce the results they do persist.

This is fine if you’re AI product recommends a surfboard instead of toilet roll when shopping for toiletries via an online marketplace (nobody dies) but less good if the AI is autopiloting a plane back to front in stormy weather without the users understanding – or even being able of knowing – what is going on and why.

So the point is this: whatever methods you use, make sure you – and in some cases your users – understand them well enough to ensure they are as bug free and reliable as possible. If you do, you’ll keep things safe but very likely further enhance your execution of your solution.

The Curtain Call

The best magicians master method but prioritize effect. They select the best tools for the job, having invested significant effort in understanding the effect in the mind of the audience.

Simple or familiar methods often do best, allowing greater room to focus on presentation and execution against the needs of effect.

Technology vendors and innovators should do the same.

Master different technologies by all means, demonstrate you’ve considered them even, but prioritise problem-solving based on a deep understanding of your users.

The best technology may not be the smartest, shiniest or most hyped up or cutting edge. It may be something you have (or your customers have) but didn’t think to use.

It may even be something unrelated to a technology! If so, your technology solution – whether vendor or innovator – might not solve the user need.

That’s still a great effect – you’ve not wasted anyone’s time ramming a blockchain down their throat when all they needed was a database, perhaps better use of the one they already had. Your intended users might enjoy your honesty and efforts at working through the problem with them, even if you’re solution isn’t ultimately what they need.

Master your methods but be guided by effect.

Be the David Copperfield of technology and innovation. Your Las Vegas residency awaits.

David Coppefield levitation flying
A recent legaltech & innovation presentation at a large law firm in 2020
AIMagicMagicians
0 comment
previous post
Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is changing the rules
next post
Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt the basics at school!

Related Posts

Contracts and the data capture challenge

October 14, 2021

The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its...

July 19, 2021

Search

Stay in touch

Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin Email

Tweets

Great piece by @LegalTechHub1 summarizing critical evaluation criteria for use of LLMs in legal settings. Asking t… https://t.co/3dxfx7UFzw

17-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
Unsurprising but exciting. To what extent will this overlap with or challenge the "for legal" apps offering, or lau… https://t.co/Gzw4jYrMAs

16-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
GPT4 demo's last 5 mins should be a must watch for legal / tax folks! Spoiler Alert: snippet of US tax code is use… https://t.co/RqcljH3ILK

14-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
AI-generated works, artists and IP. Who owns what? Great read (with a US focus) on some key themes re generative… https://t.co/Sn289Ce4zW

06-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
A #legaltech rap by @bing chat 🎶 Yo, listen up, I got a story to tell, About legaltech and how it's changing the… https://t.co/ofrNBdfIVj

02-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they and why care?

  • 2

    Legaltech vs Lawtech. What is the difference between legaltech and lawtech? Is there one and does it matter?

  • 3

    Explainable AI – All you need to know. The what, how, why of explainable AI

  • 4

    Does legaltech actually help when you’re at the coalface?

  • 5

    Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your organisation? Findings from Legatics’ Innovate UK reports

Categories

Tags

A.I. AI Artificial Intelligence Avvoka Buying Software Career Profile Careers Coding Contract Data Deep Learning DMS Document Management System EdX Git GitHub Google Hype iManage Javascript Law Law Firms Lawtech Lawyers Legal Legal A.I. Legal Drafting Legal Innovation Legal Ops Legal Teams Legaltech Legatics Linux Machine Learning Marginal Gains Office & Dragons Open-source law Open-source software Open Source Initiative OSS Python Search Selling Software Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2020 - All Rights Reserved Lawtomated