lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
CodingLawLaw FirmsLegaltechOpen-source law

Open Source Contracts: Part 2

by info@lawtomated.com July 17, 2017
July 17, 2017 0 comment
7 min read

Imagine if lawyers from different firms collaborated on standard documentation for everyday legal transactions, e.g. loan agreements, wills, conveyancing etc.  What if it was all freely available to their clients too? We call this open-source contracts (“OSC“). 

This is part 2 of a 4 part series of posts exploring whether the legal industry could and / or should adopt an open-source approach to legal documentation.

Part 2 explores whether and to what extent the open-source software paradigm could be applied to legal contracts. 

Check out the full series: part 1; part 2; part 3; and part 4.

Is legal drafting like writing code?

Yes and no

Similarities

Drafting contracts and writing code involve many similar disciplines, constructs, and themes in terms of how a contract is put together versus how the code is written:

Similarities and Differences between law and coding

Differences

However, there are many interrelated differences regarding the nature of legal language (and human language in general) and code:

1. Definition

Coding languages are formally defined.  Each language has a strict mathematical definition for their syntax and a formal mathematical definition for their semantics.  Human languages do not; rather they evolved through millennia and lack formal and unambiguous definition. 

For this reason, coding languages are precise whereas human languages are imprecise.

2. Grammar

Coding languages need a “context-free grammar“; there should be only one way to interpret a statement and this interpretation is independent of the “tokens” (i.e. words) in the statement.  Human languages are “context-sensitive” languages; the meaning of one word depends on the other words in the sentence as well as its relative placement to other words.  A computer reading a program can only have one interpretation whereas a human reading a contract can have multiple interpretations of the same drafting.

This is one reason natural language processing is hard for machines.

3. Strict

Coding languages adhere to strict rules regarding the uses of symbols and punctuation marks, e.g. (), {}, [], ;, “, ‘ , <, >, =, +, *, -, =, /, and # to name a few. All have strictly defined uses in various coding languages. 

Unlike human language, there’s no room to repurpose these symbols beyond their intended use.  If you don’t use them as intended your code means nothing to a computer and “breaks”, i.e. won’t run or stops running mid-flow.

With human languages, you can take liberties with grammar, punctuation, and word meaning yet remain understood. You might be thought an idiot if you do it wrong, but you’ll be understood to a greater or lesser extent!

Code is less forgiving.

4. Ambiguity

Computer languages are unambiguous and have bounded and precisely defined vagueness (such that no instance of vagueness can ever contribute to ambiguity). 

As a result, every computer program has exactly zero or one meaning. If a program has zero meanings, it has an error in it. If it has one meaning, it’s a valid program you can run. If it has two… well, it doesn’t.  Either you misunderstood the documentation, or the documentation is erroneous. No program ever has two meanings. You’d be hard-pressed to find any human language sentence of reasonable complexity that doesn’t have more than one possible meaning!

By contrast, all human languages abound with ambiguity and arbitrary vagueness. 

5. Complexity

Programming Languages

Computer languages are simple. The most complex computer language barely comes close to the structural complexity of the simplest full-fledged human languages. In terms of syntax, some of them are completely regular; most are context-free; only a few have a very limited degree of context sensitivity.  In terms of semantics, they are extremely restricted.

Human languages are crazily complex and laced with nuance.

Conclusion

Coding languages (and human languages generally) are vastly different beasts in terms of their nature.  However, the means by which code is written and contracts drafted are more similar than not. 

In many ways, the same processes, constructs, and concepts are shared between the disciplines of drafting and coding.   

As a result, we don’t think it’s a crazy idea to think about how the OSS paradigm could apply to contract drafting, i.e. OSC.

What would OSC look like?

OSC might borrow the following features and concepts from the world of software development:

1. Collaboration

Law firms collaborating to create and curate versions of their products (e.g. contracts) and making them publicly available (not necessarily for free), including to clients and other law firms.  Collaboration would comprise the design, development, bug-fixing, and testing of legal contracts over time as new legal cases challenges or market moods shape prevailing views on how to draft a particular contract or clause.

2. Innovation

The pooling of collective knowledge could lead to the sharing of innovative drafting and / or solutions to cutting-edge legal problems.  If 1000s of lawyers are pooling knowledge to fine-tune the best drafting it is potentially more likely for innovative (or at least balanced) new contract paradigms to evolve, perhaps even hybrid contracts containing code (e.g. to execute an executory obligation based on the occurrence or absence of an extraneous fact) and traditional drafting.

3. Tech

Law firms would use cloud-based tools to curate versions of their products, e.g. something like GitHub, which is a prominent tool for version control and collaboration on OSS allowing different developers to work on the same codebase by enabling downloading / uploading of code, versioning, merging of versions and discussion. See part 3 of this series for more detail regarding this point.

4. Parameterisation

The most common clauses in contracts might become more modular and in some cases coalesce into parametrisable obligations whereby users (clients or law firms) have well-defined tramlines within which to negotiate changes to such clauses, in turn streamlining negotiations.  This might work best with executable obligations, perhaps in structured finance documentation where the operation of a clause can be determined by the presence or absence of an extraneous fact (e.g. an agreed price for a commodity on an agreed market).

5. Productisation

Collaboration could drive productisation through the homogenisation of contracts via increasing the standardisation of products applicable to each industry sector / market tier.  In turn, this could allow clients and law firms to handle greater volumes of transactions quicker and faster than before.

6. Adoption

Like OSS, making OSC products freely (or cheaply) and publicly available can create widespread adoption and a loyal community, in turn driving further innovation and user stickiness.

7. Legal Requirements

Without commercial constraints, contributors to the OSC ecosystem can be focussed on satisfying the legal requirements in contracts rather than the commercial requirements of individual clients or the law firm’s business drivers, perhaps improving the legal quality of the documents (versus improving the commercial concerns alone) thereby reducing legal errors by removing commercial cost and time pressures.

Conclusion

The above sounds great for clients.  Better collaboration and freely / publicly available legal documents mean time saved via reduced negotiations and money saved as greater quantities of high-quality legal documentation enter the public domain.   

What’s left for the law firms who charge huge fees for the generation of such contracts on a bespoke / premium basis? 

Rather a lot we’d argue.  Perhaps controversially we’d also argue that law firms are already using open source contracts, they just don’t know it yet!

Next time

In the next article, we’ll discuss whether and to what extent law firms are already engaged with open source contracts.  Jump to the next article in this series by clicking part 3.

Check out the full series: part 1; part 2; part 3; and part 4.

ContractDMSDocument Management SystemGitGitHubLawLegalLegal DraftingLinuxOpen Source InitiativeOpen-source lawOpen-source softwareOSS
0 comment
previous post
Open Source Contracts: Part 1
next post
Open Source Contracts: Part 3

Related Posts

Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022...

May 23, 2022

Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London...

April 13, 2022

Search

Stay in touch

Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin Email

Tweets

Great piece by @LegalTechHub1 summarizing critical evaluation criteria for use of LLMs in legal settings. Asking t… https://t.co/3dxfx7UFzw

17-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
Unsurprising but exciting. To what extent will this overlap with or challenge the "for legal" apps offering, or lau… https://t.co/Gzw4jYrMAs

16-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
GPT4 demo's last 5 mins should be a must watch for legal / tax folks! Spoiler Alert: snippet of US tax code is use… https://t.co/RqcljH3ILK

14-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
AI-generated works, artists and IP. Who owns what? Great read (with a US focus) on some key themes re generative… https://t.co/Sn289Ce4zW

06-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
A #legaltech rap by @bing chat 🎶 Yo, listen up, I got a story to tell, About legaltech and how it's changing the… https://t.co/ofrNBdfIVj

02-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they and why care?

  • 2

    Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

  • 3

    Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

  • 4

    To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers learn to code?

  • 5

    Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

Categories

Tags

A.I. AI Artificial Intelligence Avvoka Buying Software Career Profile Careers Coding Contract Data Deep Learning DMS Document Management System EdX Git GitHub Google Hype iManage Javascript Law Law Firms Lawtech Lawyers Legal Legal A.I. Legal Drafting Legal Innovation Legal Ops Legal Teams Legaltech Legatics Linux Machine Learning Marginal Gains Office & Dragons Open-source law Open-source software Open Source Initiative OSS Python Search Selling Software Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2020 - All Rights Reserved Lawtomated