lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
lawtomated
  • Home
  • About
  • Law
    • All Access to Justice Future lawyers Knowledge Management Law Firms Open-source law Practice of Law
      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Access to Justice

      Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is…

      Future lawyers

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Knowledge Management

      Google Document Understanding AI – features, screenshots and…

      Knowledge Management

      Structured Data vs. Unstructured Data: what are they…

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Law Firms

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Law Firms

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 3

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 2

      Open-source law

      Open Source Contracts: Part 1

      Practice of Law

      Why are lawyers unhappy?

  • Legaltech
    • All Buying Software Selling Software
      Events

      Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022…

      Events

      Future Lawyer Week UK is coming to London…

      Legaltech

      Is mobile the future of legaltech?

      Legaltech

      Future Lawyer Week 2021!

      Buying Software

      Why you should look beyond legaltech: 4 surprising…

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Buying Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Attention to Detail

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: Who to Sell

      Selling Software

      Selling to Legal Teams: 3 Mistakes To Avoid

      Selling Software

      Killer software demos that win legaltech pitches

  • Coding
    • Coding

      Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      Coding for beginners: what to learn, where, how…

      Coding

      To Code or Not to Code: should lawyers…

      Coding

      Open Source Contracts: Part 4

  • Careers
    • All Guide Profile
      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Careers

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Careers

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Careers

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to…

      Guide

      Leaving the Law for Legaltech, Legal Ops or…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers: Nitish Upadhyaya, Senior Innovation Manager, A&O’s…

      Guide

      Legaltech Careers Guide: Roles, Salaries & Work /…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Sharan Kaur, Legaltech Consultant

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Dave Wilson, Managing Director & Founder…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Mary Bonsor, CEO and Co-Founder of…

      Profile

      Legaltech Careers: Devshi Mehrotra, CEO & Co-Founder of…

  • A.I.
    • All Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score Deep Learning Hype I.A. Machine Learning Reinforcement Learning Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
      A.I.

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      A.I.

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      A.I.

      Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your…

      A.I.

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Deep Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Deep Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Deep Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Deep Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Hype

      Can your AI vendor answer these 17 questions?…

      Hype

      Why the “I” in A.I. needs to go

      I.A.

      I.A. vs. A.I. – what’s the difference and…

      Machine Learning

      Contracts and the data capture challenge

      Machine Learning

      The evolution of Natural Language Processing and its…

      Machine Learning

      Explainable AI – All you need to know….

      Machine Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Reinforcement Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Reinforcement Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Supervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Supervised Learning

      4 things you need to know about AI:…

      Supervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Supervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Machine learning with school math. Yes, you learnt…

      Unsupervised Learning

      10 hype busting A.I. articles everyone should read

      Unsupervised Learning

      A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

      Unsupervised Learning

      Google enters the contract extraction space!

  • Contact
Access to JusticePeople, Process, Problem

Divorce disruptors – how LawTech start-up amicable is changing the rules

by info@lawtomated.com March 23, 2020
March 23, 2020 0 comment
10 min read

The problem 

Getting a divorce is never easy. The process for divorcing and separating in England and Wales is a broken model. The emotional and financial cost is extremely high for individuals, families and society.

It’s estimated that half a million people divorce or separate in England and Wales each year and the cost of family breakdown to the UK taxpayer is estimated to be as much as £51 billion annually. 

Historically, traditional routes to divorce and separate were accessible through a set of gatekeepers – lawyers and solicitors who were affordable because of legal aid.

Fast forward to 2013, legal aid and access to justice is removed for all except the most serious cases of domestic abuse or violence.  For many, divorce is much less available than it once was.

The amicable origin story

Having had a personal experience of an expensive and traumatic divorce, as well as professional expertise coaching couples through the process, Kate Daly (amicable’s co-founder) knew there had to be a better way to divorce and separate so created amicable. 

A focus on collaboration, people and process

Their approach is unique in the family law world. Unlike the traditional lawyer route for divorce, amicable works with couples not individuals, combining coaching, automated processes and where necessary targeted legal input.

A big boost for this consumer-focused design decision has been a January 2020 High Court decision (England & Wales). That decision validated amicable‘s unique approach and important access to justice role (see below for further detail).

Removing friction with the targeted use of technology

amicable uses document automation (for data capture and legal document generation), interactive triage tools and secure online meeting rooms to handle the legal and procedural elements of divorce and separation.

Simple but effective, this significantly saves time capturing, transferring and utilising information between the parties and their coaches.

In turn, this helps free up time and attention, enabling greater focus on coaching couples through the emotional journey of parting ways.

This fusion of technology and psychology offers a new way for couples to untie the knot, amicably.

amicable divorce process automation

Why amicable’s mission is important

Many people want to divorce or separate amicably. However, most of the existing routes and the current legal process in England and Wales can make this very difficult. 

The below infographic summarises the 2018 figures (the latest available from the Office of National Statistics):

ONS divorce statistics infographic

Relationships form because two people have an emotional connection so the priority if a relationship comes to an end, should be tending to the emotional journey, not the legal paperwork. This isn’t often the case and is the main reason divorce and separations often turn sour and costs spiral out of control. 

Hence, amicable’s focus on streamlining the process through technology such as document automation, interactive triage tools and similar (see below), combining it with a collaborative rather than individualistic approach.

Divorce isn’t likely to go away, but a lot can be done to improve the process, outcomes and costs.

How amicable helps to solve this issue

Like lawtomated, amicable believes the law should be affordable, understandable, and accessible.  amicable combines user-friendly tech with the all-important consumer-centric human touch. A dedicated coach manages everything and supports both people through the emotional and legal journey of separating.

The focus is on the future and an arrangement that makes sense for each unique circumstance.

1. Affordability 

One of the key stressors of separating is financial uncertainty. According to the amicable team, amicable is:

  • more than ten times cheaper than going to court;
  • a third of the cost of using a lawyer; and
  • half the cost of mediation.

amicable’s charges are fixed price and transparent so that couples have peace of mind about the costs before starting the process. Simple, but effective.

2. Legal jargon-free

amicable has banished legal jargon in their communications so the process is easy to understand. They offer many free guides and tools that breakdown the process (see here for an excellent guide to the UK divorce system), including but not limited to a chatbot that can answer basic questions, a divorce timeline tool and court fee calculator. 

3. Accessible 

Every customer has access to their own online account, which dilutes the complicated legal forms into intuitive, easy to use forms.  All meetings take place in secure online meeting rooms or over the phone. This means there’s no need to traipse to offices, take time off work or be in the same place if that’s uncomfortable.  In this way, amicable is remote first.

Why it’s working

Like many consumer-facing LawTech start-ups, amicable’s founding team aren’t “recovering lawyers”, but consumers.

amicable was created as a result of Kate’s real-life experience of divorce, and draws upon experiences of other divorcees. As such, every facet of the business is designed to help people avoid the financial and emotional distress Kate and others had experienced.

The unique combination of beautiful, user-friendly tech and the all-important human touch provides people with an affordable, legal-jargon free and kind alternative to divorce and separation.

The customer’s needs and wants are at the forefront, and that’s why it’s growing so rapidly. 

According to Google, each month over three thousand people search for ‘amicable divorce’ and terms relating to ‘divorcing without lawyers’.

The demand is there, and now amicable have the solution. 

amicable seem to be hitting the right notes with consumers, currently averaging 4.8 / 5 on Trustpilot! No easy feat to pull off given the often (but perhaps unnecessarily) fraught domain within which amicable is operating, i.e. divorce.

Access to justice

Access to justice is never going to be driven by a profession that bills by the hour. It just doesn’t compute. The goals are contradictory. So, a revolution in business models must precede the mass embracing of access to justice by the profession. It needs to be underpinned by something more than rhetoric. 

In January 2020, amicable won a High Court judgment (available here) that validates amicable’s model of working with couples rather than individuals, and helping couples negotiate financial settlements together rather than having to hire two separate lawyers.

This judgment is significant as it highlighted the access to justice that amicable’s service is offering and recognises the need for alternative legal services. 

“There can be no doubt that the initiative of amicable has greatly improved access to justice for many people effectively disenfranchised from the legal process by the near total withdrawal of legal aid from private family law proceedings on 1 April 2013“

Mr Justice Mostyn

The case makes for an interesting, and uncharacteristically (for court judgments) easy read.

For us at lawtomated, the most interesting aspect is the general theme highlighted with regard to modern legal services:

There is a gap between the law / lawyers on the one hand (expensive, hard to access), and consumers on the other (outcomes-focused, cost-sensitive). In this gap sits a lot of “legalish” process, which under various laws are more or less reserved to lawyers explicitly or by market practice, but in huge need of streamlining via user centric design and application of readily available and often simple technologies and processes.

If you read the judgment, you’ll note the well-intentioned, but increasingly outdated rules, that make it tricky to operate as an alternative legal services business. The law is going to have to adapt, and as this case demonstrates, can be applied sensibly to support rather than stifle alternative legal service business models, such as amicable‘s.

Luckily for amicable, the case was won in their favour. It’s an example of how tech start-ups can challenge the legal services model, how companies can make money and help people while creating a fair and just society where everyone has access to justice.

By focussing on the needs of end-users – making divorce as painless as possible and ideally constructive with regard to on-going commitments regarding finances and children – amicable is winning over consumers and, as noted above, the courts.

The wider legal profession could learn a lot from this approach, both lawyers working in A2J but also those working in the commercial and corporate world, including high street firms, regional firms and BigLaw.

amicable shows the huge value of listening to end-users, and building services, systems and novel business models around consumers and not the lawyers, whilst necessarily navigating complicated legal and regulatory rules.

What’s next for amicable?

amicable’s future plans are to help as many couples as possible separate amicably, not just in England and Wales but in other jurisdictions across the globe.

As the rate for divorce declines (fewer couples are opting to co-habit over getting married) amicable will be developing more services that support co-habiting couples and co-parents. They’ll also be campaigning for fairer laws for co-habiting couples.  We look forward to doing a follow-up piece next year to see what’s new!


About Amicable

  • Founded in 2015 by Kate Daly and Pip Wilson, amicable is a ground-breaking, innovative approach to divorce and separation for couples. Harnessing a unique combination of relationship, legal knowledge and tech expertise, amicable is a stress-free service that focuses on the family and saves couples thousands of pounds
  • In 2019, amicable was voted the 4th most disruptive company in the UK by the Disruption 50, a strong reflection of its mission, to change the narrative around divorce and separation and shine a light on the growing population of couples who are separating amicably
  • In 2018, amicable won the ‘Social Impact of the Year’ award at The British Legal Technology awards
  • Kate Daly is also the host of The Divorce Podcast, exploring divorce from every angle
  • In 2018, Kate was included in 2018’s Maserati 100, The Sunday Times list that recognises game-changing entrepreneurs. Kate is popular in the media for offering legal jargon-free explanations of the divorce and separation journey as well as legal analysis. Kate is a Resolution trained Family Consultant and worked with many of London’s top collaborative lawyers during the mid-2000s before starting amicable in 2015.
  • Pip Wilson is CEO of amicable. Pip Wilson is a successful tech entrepreneur, having also co-founded Bluefin Solutions in 2002. She is an angel investor and start-up mentor, primarily supporting businesses founded by women. Pip is Deputy Chair of the RSA and Trustee of The Girls Network. Pip was also recognised in 2018’s Maserati 100, The Sunday Times list that recognises game-changing entrepreneurs.
AmicableDivorce
0 comment
previous post
Coding for beginners: 10 tips on how you should approach learning to code (Part 3)
next post
The secret to successful technology? It’s magic (but not what you’re thinking)

Related Posts

Legaltech adoption barriers. How many apply to your...

June 28, 2021

Does legaltech actually help when you’re at the...

June 22, 2021

Search

Stay in touch

Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin Email

Tweets

Great piece by @LegalTechHub1 summarizing critical evaluation criteria for use of LLMs in legal settings. Asking t… https://t.co/3dxfx7UFzw

17-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
Unsurprising but exciting. To what extent will this overlap with or challenge the "for legal" apps offering, or lau… https://t.co/Gzw4jYrMAs

16-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
GPT4 demo's last 5 mins should be a must watch for legal / tax folks! Spoiler Alert: snippet of US tax code is use… https://t.co/RqcljH3ILK

14-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
AI-generated works, artists and IP. Who owns what? Great read (with a US focus) on some key themes re generative… https://t.co/Sn289Ce4zW

06-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite
A #legaltech rap by @bing chat 🎶 Yo, listen up, I got a story to tell, About legaltech and how it's changing the… https://t.co/ofrNBdfIVj

02-Mar-2023

Reply Retweet Favorite

Popular Posts

  • 1

    A.I. Technical: Machine vs Deep Learning

  • 2

    Is mobile the future of legaltech?

  • 3

    Introducing Legal Innovators California – 9th June 2022 in San Francisco

  • 4

    The Legaltech cheat sheet. All you need to know about legaltech products and use cases

  • 5

    Explainable AI – All you need to know. The what, how, why of explainable AI

Categories

Tags

A.I. AI Artificial Intelligence Avvoka Buying Software Career Profile Careers Coding Contract Data Deep Learning DMS Document Management System EdX Git GitHub Google Hype iManage Javascript Law Law Firms Lawtech Lawyers Legal Legal A.I. Legal Drafting Legal Innovation Legal Ops Legal Teams Legaltech Legatics Linux Machine Learning Marginal Gains Office & Dragons Open-source law Open-source software Open Source Initiative OSS Python Search Selling Software Supervised Learning Unsupervised Learning
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • RSS

@2020 - All Rights Reserved Lawtomated